Security forces shot and killed two militants during an encounter Friday in the Sopore area, about 55 kilometers, or more than 33 miles, from Srinagar, the region’s capital.

The forces returning from the incident were stoned by a mob, which also torched a security vehicle.

Troopers then fired to disperse the mob, killing two people and wounding five others.

“They attacked and torched our vehicle. Our personnel opened fire in self-defense,” said Prabhakar Tripathi, a spokesman for India’s paramilitary unit, the Central Reserve Police Force.

Authorities imposed a curfew, and troops and police were deployed to the area to defuse tensions.

Because childbirth in Roman times was more dangerous than it is today, infant mortality was high and infant burials are common at Roman villas. However, the massive number found at the site in Buckinghamshire, just northwest of London, is far higher than at any other Roman villa in Britain, the Buckinghamshire County Council said.

Recent examination of the Roman-era bodies shows “the infants almost all died around the time of birth, suggesting this may be an example of deliberate infanticide,” the council said.

That was legal in Roman times if the mother was a slave, and a large number of deliberately killed babies may show someone wanted to keep the mothers working, it said.

The villa was occupied for several hundred years during the Roman era, and there is a theory it may have been used as a brothel, which would explain the high number of unwanted babies, the council said.

There is also a theory that the building was an imperial supply depot with many literate workers, since a large number of writing implements were found at the site, along with a high number of kilns for drying corn. If those literate workers were mostly women, they may have been forced to kill their babies and keep working, the council said.

Yewden Villa, as the site is known, was first excavated in 1912. It was later covered over and is now a field. The report on the dig didn’t appear until 1921 because World War I got in the way, the council said.

A community archaeology project recently started looking at the 1912 finds, most of which had never been examined, hoping a century’s worth of new research may shed new light on them, the council said.

The 1921 report, which was published in the national journal Archaeologia, described the grounds as “positively littered with babies.”

“A few were laid at length, but the majority were evidently carried and buried wrapped in a cloth or garment, huddled in a little bundle, so that the head was almost central, and the knees above it,” the report said.

“As nothing marked the position of these tiny graves, a second little corpse was sometimes deposited on one already in occupation of a spot, apparently showing that these interments took place secretly, after dark.”

Most academics agree that large Roman villas were built and used by a small but extremely wealthy section of the society that lived in the area between the first and fourth centuries AD, the council said.

They were used as both residences and administrative and servicing centers, it said.

Adults had to be buried outside a settlement when they died, but that rule did not apply to infants, the council said.

On Friday, ICANN, the not-for-profit corporation that coordinates the internet’s naming system, voted to allow the application of the controversial “.xxx” top-level domain name for sites that display adult content.

The domain, which would need further approval before going live on the internet, would be applied to adult entertainment sites just as “.com” is now.

The .xxx internet suffix, which was first proposed six years ago by ICM Registry, a group that sells domain names, “will provide a place online for adult entertainment providers and their service providers who want to be part of our voluntary self regulatory community,” according to that company’s news release.

Adopting .xxx will be optional. However, some tech blogs speculate a push to make the domain mandatory for adult-only sites.

ICM Registry has already taken 110,000 pre-reservations for the domain, which could be available in early 2011, if not sooner, its news release states.

While the company says labeling adult content online “will allow for simple and effective filtering for those who wish to do so,” not everyone is pleased with ICANN’s decision to approve the domain.

Some people involved in the industry are hesitant to accept the domain, “fearing it will lead to censorship, as it would be very easy to block the entire domain instead of individual sites,” Rick Johnson of Portfolio.com wrote Thursday.

On the other hand, “some religious groups are against the creation of the domain, as it would lend more legitimacy to the adult entertainment industry,” he wrote.

What do you think of the “.xxx” top-level domain? Is it necessary? Let us know with comments on this post.